| This is a discussion on PreFlop Play and Pot Odds within the online poker forums, in the Cash Games section; I've been playing a tight strategy preflop and its been working to a degree but I feel like I should be playing more hands against ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| PreFlop Play and Pot Odds I've been playing a tight strategy preflop and its been working to a degree but I feel like I should be playing more hands against small raises with my more marginal holdings. Obviously there is no question when holding a top tier hand (AA KK QQ AK) but when I hold something less (KQ QT J9) my usual action would be to fold to a raise in front of me giving credit for Ax. However now that I have a good number of hand records I can see how often each holding wins. Just for illustration lets say 99 wins 40% of the time its played preflop. Can I assume that its a playable hand even if there is a raise in front of me as long as I'm getting at least 2.5 / 1 pot odds? Or am I not seeing something else here? Common advice is to limp in to a pot if there are a lot of limpers because you have good odds even with hands that you wouldn't normally play, I think that my strategy would be along the same lines. It would be influenced by position because without a strong hand I wouldn't have odds to enter the pot since there would be little there when UTG or first to enter. Obviously, it has to be tempered with other strategy when there are fewer people in the pot. Any comments or suggestions would be welcome. |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | PreFlop Play and Pot Odds | |
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| im not sure about this myself. i think people put too much emphasis on value sometimes (eg. there are 6 limpers so i might as well limp cuz the pot odds are good if i hit the right flop). i was looking through my stats the other day and noticed a large leak was me calling the BB in the SB with any 2 cards when there were a decent number of limpers. in the long run i dont think its a profitable strategy |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| You're thinking along the right lines, but preflop you should be more concerned about implied odds than pot odds. To take a trivial example: If you're playing $100NL against someone who will raise to $3 preflop and always shove for his remaining $97 no matter what the flop comes, you're correct to call his raise with any two cards. Even 72o will hit two pairs or better often enough to warrant seeing a flop. So no, pot odds are not the main concern preflop. |
|
#5 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| re: PreFlop Play and Pot Odds poker Quote:
Maybe if its a tight player I would give more credence to the raise but when I'm faced with 4-5 people that are playing 50-70% of the hands and raising 40% of the time post flop, I feel that I have to give more emphasis to the pot odds over hand strength. Otherwise I'm just laying down and letting them roll over me. Now, mind you I'm not advocating playing weak hands against a raise, but if the pot odds are such that if I hit I'm going get get a good payoff. The hand would have to have some merit (Ax-Qx,flush or straight possibilities) to justify going forward. Not just hitting a pair. |
|
#7 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
If you're getting 2.5/1 on a call then you're going to be playing a multi-way pot. Some hands do well in those situations (pairs and SC's) and some don't. Hands like KQ, QT, and J9 don't. Quote:
Pot odds aren't enough to justify calling raises with hands like QT. You won't hit very often and when you do it'll be hard to get paid off. Quote:
|
Number of Posts: 7
Number of Authors: 5