|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
POKER MATHS
I was doing some math.
If won 100% of the sessions i played, but only played with 33% of my bankroll (BR) during 66% of those sessions and 50% during a further 80% of sessions, my -EV would be negated and therefore turned into PLUS +EV (only top players have PLUS +EV) only if i was to use the 33.6 BB rule as a rule of thumb when buying into 66% of my sessions with over 88.5% of my BR invested in any given pot, on any given table, given that it was a NL ring game and not a tournament that cost a little over 13% of my BR in entry fees, where I would need a further 19.75% equity to continue past the first hour with a rate of 313 BB/hr and a ROI% a little over 23 during weekdays taking into account the fold equity I would get through implied odds from the donks. Now, as a result to all this, I have decided that from now on, as a rule of thumb, I ill only buy into a tourney if its free to enter, and will only be playing on a cash table for play money, this way my losses are at a minimum and I remain in PLUS +EV situations for the remainder of my career, whos with me? |
|
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
An infinately better solution is to start a new ID and only play freerolls....as soon as you win anything you will have an infinate ROI%, which is infinately better than 99.97% of poker players.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yeah its tough when your new to poker to truly get a good firm grip on the maths behind winning poker, you guys are just lucky its christmas time and im sharing possibly the biggest secret in poker, and if your asking yourself, is it really a secret, then ask your self if you had ever heard of PLUS +EV before, if so, then you already know the super sytem, if not, study it and follow it to the letter, also, if you only play freerolls, as an advanced theory to what welly said you will never have a negative ROI%, wich is great for your rep stay in school, eat your greens, and dont do drugs |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is this a serious post, btw. Only ask, cause I still can't work out the opening thread, and I read a book once, so I consider myself intelligent(my IQ is in double figures............)
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Greatly appreciated. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Umm this is like the world's most obvious joke topic ever.
I can't decide whether it's funny or not - but I think as usual with joke topics the funniest thing about it is the people taking it seriously. ![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
actually dorkus, I was terribly bored so i thought id make a joke topic about all the maths talk that can dribble out of peoples mouths at times, and teh insiration of this is your 2 remarks from toadly, so i thankyou
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Originally Posted by Toadly
When you win 66% of teh time playing with 33% of you bank roll puts you in no danger actually dorkus, I was terribly bored so i thought id make a joke topic about all the maths talk that can dribble out of peoples mouths at times, and teh insiration of this is your 2 remarks from toadly, so i thankyou It is toadly or the teh mistake is all a coincidence. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Very funny. Boy it's pretty bad when a blonde gets this and the rest of you don't![]() |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
lol, it could seem busted, but assure i am not toadly, HONEST, i am an index finger typer who types to fast for my own good, and as a result i am constantly typein the teh, but if you look at my personal info im sure you will see i am not toadly, but nice pick up anyway, just shows how very easy it could be to be wrongly accused of something and have very little chance of defending yourself, imagine being framed, WOW, that would be nearly as bad as drowning or burnig to death
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
well, as usual jack, you raise only good points
now to the best of my knowledge, drowning is indeed +EV at or above 67.35% lung capacity in 3 inches of water or more in temperatures of no less then 3 degrees Celsius, not taking into account the buoyancy coefficients of the clothes you have on at the time The EV behind burning is nothing short of a myth, people say its +EV but its actually a 9.6-2 underdog to any drive by shooting or prison stabbing being framed is 100% -EV if sent to maximum security, if you escape with just a stint in the local cell it is neither + or - EV, it is what they call infinite EV squared, |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Just some additional food for thought. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
