| This is a discussion on pocket pairs within the online poker forums, in the Cash Games section; In a no limit cash game what positions would with a pocket pairs 88 - 22... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| pocket pairs In a no limit cash game what positions would with a pocket pairs 88 - 22 |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | pocket pairs | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| I beleive a big part of it would be your image at the table and how is the over all table. Is it loose, tight, what type of player is acting after you. I llike to see cheap flops with low pockets, hoping to hit the trips, or if the board is unkind I can get out of the hand |
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| I will play them from all positions. If I am first in I will open raise. If there is a limper or another raiser I will call if I have set odds (1 in 20). The only times I will fold them preflop are if a) I haven't got set odds. b) There is a very loose opponent to act behind who I think will raise and ruin my set odds. Just for the record I also play 99 in this manner. And occasionally TT. I often fold if I don't make my set. Sometimes cbetting if I can but usually not. |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#5 | ||||
| ||||
| 55-22 in early position, almost never unless I'm at a tight table and I don't think there will be much action behind me, maybe one/two more limpers... 88-66 I might flat call depending on how aggressive the table is, the more aggressive, the less likely to call. The closer that I get to the button, the more likely I am to call or open raise with very few or no limpers behind me. The ideal situation is to have just the blinds call and then hit the set or bet out on a scary board(high cards) and see if they budge. Many times the blinds will call either to defend or because of the odds they're getting. If they fight back, chances are I will fold. |
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| re: pocket pairs poker Very table dependent. If the table is passive, then you can limp with 22-88 in any position hoping to hit a set, but if its an aggressive table, you pretty much have to fold them in early position as you will get raised and playing them out of position in a raised pot is not what you want. I also like to bring them in for a raise occasionally at less aggressive tables as it helps disguise your big hands. |
|
#9 | ||||
| ||||
| if u hit your trips those would be decent hands..but b4 the flp thatd be like mid position hands, but id have to say if i was in your position id be min betting b4 the flop juss in case u do hit your set, but then again i'd be wiery with both these hands |
|
#13 | ||||
| ||||
| I think this is one of those questions that have to many variables for a straight out answer. Ring games or tournaments, size of blinds, loose or tight table coupled with position(to judge your odds of being raised if you limp). I will say that big blinds at the final table with 3-4 of you left might warrant a raise to just try and take the blinds, while a full ring game in late position with limpers would warrant a simple call and see approach. Basically there is no answer without knowing the situation. |
|
#14 | ||||
| ||||
| agreed Quote:
to flop a set rarther than trips tho.... i mean 3 of a kind......i mean a pair with another matching card..... of fuggetaboutit already |
|
#17 | ||||
| ||||
| In cash game, if you're the first one in the pot, you should raise it, especially if you have open-raised much before. It's easy to put someone on a low pair or low suited connector if you only limp when raised much before. Then if you get a caller you you see what the flop brings, if you miss you throw in a 2/3 pot c-bet if the board is safe. If you get reraised pre-flop out of position and you aren't getting the right odds, just throw it away. |
|
#19 | ||||
| ||||
| in MTTs, Sit&gos i am value betting the hand, folding to a raise. In ring games, i am limping in, going for a set... If i find a tight table, i may do a mid raise well on the button. It all depends on the table, if it's loose i limp, if it's tight i raise, well in position.... I would watch on calling any raise, well holding low PP. |
|
#20 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
A set is very powerful Trips often get out kickered or open the board up to a FH A set is a big hand, trips is a much smaller hand. |
|
#22 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
-Who is left to act behind--are you going to get raised / reraised if you open? -Do your opponents have hands/stacks to pay you off the 7-1 odds you need to justify set-mining? -Are you likely to pick up the blinds with a small raise, and use your PP to defend if someone plays back at you? -Has the table been acting completely passive, and unlikely to raise if you limp in from early position? (i.e. are there usually 4-6 players to each flop with no raises?) My only rule of thumb to play PP is if I'm on the button or in the cut-off; the pot still hasn't been opened; and there are no hyper-aggressive maniacs ready to act behind me. If that is the case, I'll open the pot with a standard raise, and be prepared to surrender them at the first sign of aggression if I don't improve. Good Luck. |
|
#23 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I had AA cracked 3 times in a row one day, should I have stopped playing them? |
|
#24 | ||||
| ||||
| re: pocket pairs poker See here. |
|
#26 | ||||
| ||||
| i would play them as i think is the proper way to play them. 88 i would play strong as if i have a good hand , which i do and 99% of the time raise PF. pocket dueces i would try to keep it small pf since they are not favourite against many hands. and if i hit a set i would wave home the money trapping my opponent Phil Ivey style |
|
#27 | ||||
| ||||
| To take a good hand you need to see the flop because of this I recommend you play in this way: To play cash game with pockets pair 22-88 you need to play against limpers. If you are playing in an agressive table, you have to fold with this cards. |
Number of Posts: 27
Number of Authors: 23