|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Notes on players
I am just starting to write notes on players. I want to know what sort on things I should be writing. I put such things as passive, agressive, call machene. Help! I have not seen much on the topic.
|
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The below thread should help with the lexicon of poker. Hand Analysis Lingo and other Poker Terms Regarding the original question, see below. making notes |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I just keep a running total with tick marks as a quick reference. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy. If everyone has seen ten flops except one guy who hasn't seen any and he suddenly raises pre-flop... he probably has the goods. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Now I don't suggest this, (more for ethical reason) but on a poker site not open to Americans anymore...I use to keep very detailed stats from an on-line database. When I approched a new SNG... I had a basic idea of what I was up against before the game started....avg. buy-in, % finish, and so on.... Unfair advantage or cheating you ask? Not when everyone has access to the same information.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"Will those who read this derive any benefit from my thought processes, or is it obvious I really want 50 posts in order to play?" |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like to note the kind of plays they make. If they tend to chase, do they overvalue certain cards, can they be pushed off a winning hand, do they have trouble letting go of hands. Which means I only note a player that I am able to observe for a while.
|
| Similar Threads for: Poker > Notes on players | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Making notes on players. Overrated? Waste of time? | TurnipHead | Strategy Forum | 15 | 08-09-2007 3:33 PM |
| Notes on players at poker sites | Juice300x3 | Strategy Forum | 1 | 28-01-2007 4:22 AM |
