| Party Poker | Titan Poker | PokerStars | Bodog | Pacific Poker |
|
|||||||

![]() |
|
Poker - NLH Small Stakes Cash Game: where are the profits?
|
  |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
NLH Small Stakes Cash Game: where are the profits?
Written by timzc1 and copied off P5's. Viery good information and was a good read. Theres a lot of small stakes players on this site(including me) who might find this helpful
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
quote: Don’t bluff! Without a clear read on an opponent....
Thats a contradiction. Bluffing in NLHM small stakes CAN be profitable in the correct circumstance. I've won a LOT calling river all in's from people who i KNOW are maniacs! However this IS rare and usuallyall in's on the river mean what they are! Need reads on players but bluffing is sometimes a profitable move. There's a lot of money in small stakes by simply being patient and large playing good hands! Also limping with the suited connectors is a good move as no one puts you on a straight with a low flop ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly. That's why it specifies "without a clear read on an opponent".
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
thanks misch
PokerStars Game #8071697030: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2007/01/22 - 17:13:48 (ET) Table 'Algol V' 9-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: mahoney01 ($29.40 in chips) Seat 2: stechyshyn ($7.25 in chips) Seat 3: Mikele BaBa ($9.55 in chips) Seat 4: eykey ($12.85 in chips) Seat 6: Nikkihundo ($10.25 in chips) Seat 7: nostra3 ($21.95 in chips) Seat 8: joosebucklol ($40.10 in chips) Seat 9: TTMaster222 ($47.40 in chips) stechyshyn: posts small blind $0.10 Mikele BaBa: posts big blind $0.25 skrpec: sits out *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to joosebucklol [4d 4c] eykey: folds Nikkihundo: folds nostra3: folds joosebucklol: calls $0.25 TTMaster222: raises $0.75 to $1 mahoney01: folds stechyshyn: folds Mikele BaBa: folds joosebucklol: calls $0.75 *** FLOP *** [Th 7d Kc] joosebucklol: checks TTMaster222: checks *** TURN *** [Th 7d Kc] 4♠ joosebucklol: checks TTMaster222: checks *** RIVER *** [Th 7d Kc 4s] 3♥ joosebucklol: bets $39.10 and is all-in TTMaster222: calls $39.10 *** SHOW DOWN *** joosebucklol: shows [4d 4c] (three of a kind, Fours) TTMaster222: mucks hand joosebucklol collected $77.55 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $80.55 | Rake $3 Board [Th 7d Kc 4s 3h] Seat 1: mahoney01 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 2: stechyshyn (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 3: Mikele BaBa (big blind) folded before Flop Seat 4: eykey folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 6: Nikkihundo folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 7: nostra3 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 8: joosebucklol showed [4d 4c] and won ($77.55) with three of a kind, Fours Seat 9: TTMaster222 mucked [Ks Tc] |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
you want to stick at a table, and you want that table to have an average chip stack of about 15 to 20 times the big blind
so for 0.05/0.10 an avg size of between $7 and $10 is a good table. The avg pot an hour isnt as important. If the tbale has short stacks, then your raises are pointless if they're nearly a whole players stacks so its either fold or all in, and for a table full of $20+, the opposite will happen which you dont want either A nice mix is what ya need ![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I find that there are always a couple of spots at the table where people are frequently coming and going. The odds are that your table will change from tight to aggressive to tight, etc. IMO it's better to stay at a table so you can at least get a notebook on the people who are there for a while with you, then to move around a lot.
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bluffing is more useful in information control, than it is as a profit center.
In other words you may find that bluffing increases pay offs when you make big hands. In other words on rare occasion open raising j3 off from early position, then check folding to an A on the flop will get your AA raise from ealry position payed off on later hands giving your bigger hands much more value. game theory states that optimal strategy includes bluffing whether you know anything about your opponent or not. It applies to all limits as game theory is fundamental to poker. Exploitive strategy would also require bluffing, although to exploit your opponents it sounds like they have an overwhelming call showdown frequency. If so, that is hugely unfortunate, and is also an argument that the micros do not prepare you for even slightly larger limits.. Bill H. |
![]() |
|
Similar Threads for: NLH Small Stakes Cash Game: where are the profits?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chip n a chair :) | ChuckTs | Poker Rooms | 9 | 30-08-2008 5:03 PM |
| Interview with F Paulsson | Dorkus Malorkus | Golden Archive | 18 | 09-11-2006 5:08 PM |
