| This is a discussion on Min-Raise vs a c-bet bluff? (25nl) within the online poker forums, in the Cash Games section; I have seen players fold to a min-raise on a dry flop a couple times. lets say you have AQo on the BTN. Utg raises ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Min-Raise vs a c-bet bluff? (25nl) I have seen players fold to a min-raise on a dry flop a couple times. lets say you have AQo on the BTN. Utg raises 3x, you call, everyone else folds. Flop is something like 9 3 4 rainbow. UTG c-bets about half-pot. If I were to raise here before, I would re-raise to 3x his raise, but I think the 2x raise is more effective b/c ppl seem to think min-raise =monster and also if UTG re-raises you can fold and lose less chips. your take? |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Min-Raise vs a c-bet bluff? (25nl) | |
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Min-Raise vs a c-bet bluff? (25nl) poker Look for the repeat signs, is this their common play. I have have noticed a lot of min raise c-betters are just contesting the pot, although they might have something that resembles a hand, many of them fold after the turn, or to that fact a re-raise. |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| the min-raise can be a particularly effective tactic if you have a small sort of a draw when you min-raise the flop, the oop villain is more likely to check to you on the turn, meaning you see both remaining cards very cheaply at least, that is what i think. on dry boards though... looks scary simply because it is so weird |
Number of Posts: 4
Number of Authors: 4