| This is a discussion on Limit, shorthanded within the online poker forums, in the Cash Games section; Whats a good percentage of flops seen in 6 max limit?... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Limit, shorthanded Whats a good percentage of flops seen in 6 max limit? |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Limit, shorthanded | |
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| Whats the VP thing again? mmmmmmm i thought something was wrong lol. Yeah i just tried it for my first few times, had good results, but when i clicked stats on the pokerstars options, it said flops seen: 60% lol. Im guessing my good run wouldnt have lasted much longer. i think its mainly when im in blinds, i always complete the sb and if the bb is only raised once i often call too. Gotta work on it. |
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Limit, shorthanded poker That's something that I always wondered about in limit poker, when you say you complete the BB if it only has been raised once. I find myself doing that alot also, particularly if the pot is multiway, for the reason that it seems worth to put that extra bet in when compared to pot size. If you're playing .50/1$ limit, 1st player in makes it 2 bets and 2 players call, when it comes to you pot is $3.75 already. It always seems worth it to me to put in the extra .50c even if my hand is, for example, Q6o, because I tend to look at it as I'm getting more than 7 to 1 on my money. Of course the problem with this play is that it may cost me alot after the flop if I'm not careful. I think the way this gets fixed is when you are playing higher limits. If the game were, say, $20/$40, folding would probably get easier. |
|
#7 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
My gut feeling is that raising and calling has the same value. Quote:
If you want some kind of rule of thumb, play hands where you can think of "good flops" that also seem likely to come often enough to warrant playing them for the pot odds you're given. If that makes sense. JTs, for instance - no problem. A-9 - also good. Flopping an ace will often be enough to win. Any pocket pair is obvious. Q7o? what are you hoping for? QQ7? Cheers, FP |
Number of Posts: 7
Number of Authors: 4