| This is a discussion on Limit games - should u slow down against a flush draw? within the online poker forums, in the Cash Games section; Hello. Playing a lot of O8 recently but I think this question could apply to all poker `hi` games. When u hit a flop with ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Limit games - should u slow down against a flush draw? Hello. Playing a lot of O8 recently but I think this question could apply to all poker `hi` games. When u hit a flop with a set and there is a flush draw, should u slow down when playing limit??? Simple question but difficult answer??? |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Limit games - should u slow down against a flush draw? | |
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| If i hit trips and there is a flush draw out there the money is going in. I'll gamble in that situation every time. If you were aggresive with your pair pre flop then continue to bet big when you hit trips on flop. You have him beat for now why let him see a free card, no check. Def don't min raise you don't want him to think your weak that gives him more reason to chase his flush. My only fear of hitting trips on flop with flush draw is losing control of the hand. for ex. calling the rediculous value bets he puts out on his draw so that i can punish him on the river. |
|
#5 | ||||
| ||||
| Gotta agree with the other answers, with one caveat - if you hit the set and bet max (pot or limit) and he raises, I'll just call (unless that puts me close to all-in, in which case I'll just put it all out there). If he raises or re-raises you, he's willing to 4-bet it on the flop and turn on his draw. You're not going to push him off the hand, so you have to go to damage control against that kind of mindset. |
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Limit games - should u slow down against a flush draw? poker It does not work in all forms of poker!!! I play a lot of O8, so I guess it is different. The reason I say slow down is that the other guy will get the odds to make their call everytime. Havinging said that, I would bet out with a set when a flush draw is possible (I have just done it and they hit their flush on the river ) |
|
#8 | ||||
| ||||
| Interesting FP and thanks for that. However, I can understand that when your opponent is only 15% to win the pot, but what about when the other person is say 25%? Say u put another 10% into a pot (for example only) I can`t get my thick head around it, but does that not mean u r making a mistake, even though you are ahead? I appreciate you answering FP - I know u r ahighly skilled limit player. |
|
#9 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Even if you're only 51% to win, you're still winning 51% of the money going in. I think you're having trouble wrapping your head around this because you're stuck on the idea of a "mistake" and you define making a mistake as "the other guy not making a mistake." It's perfectly normal (especially in limit) that you have several players not make a single mistake postflop. One of them will still win more money over the long haul, but because there's dead money in the pot there can often be situations where neither you nor your opponent make any mistakes. Mistakes aren't "digital". It's a smooth line. Look: You're playing no-limit, and you can bet any amount you want to. It's on the turn, let's say that the pot is $1,000 and you and your opponent have infinitely deep stacks. You know, because he showed you, that your opponent has a flush draw. You also know, because you've studied odds, that your opponent is 20% to win this pot. Here's the thing: If you bet your whole stack - infinity - your opponent will make an infinitely large mistake to call you. If you bet $1,000, he will make a mistake to the tune of $400 (losing $1k 80% of the time, winning $2k 20% of the time). If you bet $500, he will make a $200 mistake. If you bet $250, he will make a $0 mistake. This is the breakeven point. If you bet $100, he will gain$140. If you bet $50, he will gain $170 If you bet $0, he will gain $200 So while it's true that he's not making a mistake when you bet less than $250, he's winning more and more the less you bet. And who is he winning this extra money from? You. As an extreme example: The huge pot. Let's say that you play $3/$6 LHE, and it's heads-up on the turn. For whatever reason, some millionaire walks by and tosses $1,000 in the pot and says "here's something for you to play for." Your opponent is now correct to call with virtually any hand, because unless he knows that he's drawing dead, it doesn't matter even if he has a one-outer. I know you already understand this, but here's the kicker: You STILL want to bet your strong hands. It doesn't matter that he's correct to call with any-two, because you will STILL collect the lion's share of whatever amount of money you get him to put in. The dead money in the pot is there to help the weaker hand chase, but the strong hand wants to win even MORE money. |
|
#10 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
There is a huge difference between having a set of 3s and a set of Ks. If you have 3's, you might already be crushed. And you can count on another 2 over cards coming. And IF you hit your boat, you can count on that pair on board giving someone else a bigger boat. You will never rest easy with your 3s until you see quads. Now on the other hand, if you have Ks, you not only have the current nuts, but if the board pairs, you are probably still golden (you can't worry about some freak situation involving an ace or 2 ). That said, the bet after the flop is a small one. So I would probably bet out to induce a fold. But as mentioned, the pot odds are in most everyone's favor to call - particularly if they have a high flush draw, 2 pair or even perhaps high pair plus good runner runner possibilities (i.e. AKQT, maybe even with 2 of the cards being spades). You didn't ask about the turn & river, but of course, it all depends on what comes. If the flush comes on the turn, you check and prepare to lay down the 3s. If it's Ks you have, I check, but might call a single bet and hope for the board to pair up for the nuts. If there's a bet AND a reraise to me, I probably have to fold. I'm not counting on the board to pair up on the river. |
|
#11 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Well explained - I get it now. Also thanks to Dive - u were just beaten to the punch by FR !!! |
|
#12 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Limit games - should u slow down against a flush draw? poker Quote:
|
|
#13 | ||||
| ||||
| extension for painted-straight draws... Thank you for posting this question - I was just thinking about something similar today. I understand FPs line but have a question on a similar hand. Top set in a painted straight draw like: ![]() ![]() ![]() I figure the outcome is similar - as I am in front of any drawing hands. Looks a bit creepy though. |
|
#16 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
As a general rule, a reference to 'limit' means 'fixed' limit. Pot limit will generally be referred to as PL or PLO (or PLO8 since the OP was talking about his regular play in O8 games). |
|
#17 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#18 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Limit games - should u slow down against a flush draw? poker I would put my money in the middle. You will win more often than not, and keep in mind, your implied odds are actually pretty good, because if the board pairs and makes their flush, you'll win a whole lot. |
|
#19 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
But I don't assume Opp having the flush or straight but drawing. I know I'm rather dead if they do. |
|
#20 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#26 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#27 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#28 | ||||
| ||||
| I have possibly confused things a little... I play a lot of O8. I did say that I thought the game would be irrelevant as say a flop of give a flush/ straight draw and poss in both O8 and holdem.The big difference in O8 is obviously the lo. So it is a general question relating to both. Using the above example, a nut flush draw has 9 outs = about 20% to hit on each street. 10J has 8 outs = 18% to hit on each street. Would I be correct thinking someone with say :Ah: :Jc: would have 38% chance on each street?If so, on the flop they are 76% to hit if they bet out turn and river? Now this get complicated. If u had :Kh: :Ks: x x. COULD NOT GET ALL OF THE CARDS TO SHOW |
|
#29 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
twice. So either you have 9 flush outs and 6 straight outs, or 7 flush outs and 8 straight outs. And as long as we're talking about low, there's also low draw. No idea what the odds are for that, runner runner 3 thru 7, no pair.Ya know, of the cards that are in the smiley section, can't they put them in order or something? P.S. I mean my own error above when I said "a 5, 6, 7, J, Q, or K can do the job. That's uh... a lot of outs". The 5 & K are NOT outs, as you'd have the straight without them. The 5 is only an out if a 6 or 7 ALSO hits for the butt end of a straight. The K is only an out if a J or Q also hits or a higher straight. Last edited by Divebitch : 10th January 2009 at 3:09 PM. |
Number of Posts: 29
Number of Authors: 15