| Titan Poker | Party Poker | Bodog | Pacific Poker |
|
|||||||

![]() |
|
Poker - How Much to bet on a semi-bluff?
|
  |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
How Much to bet on a semi-bluff?
Situation:
.10/.25 NL Hold 'EM, Full Ring on Bodog. Under the gun, I have 9cTc. I raise to .80. There are four callers. Flop is Jc8h4c. I have an open-ended straight draw and a flush draw. Pot is $3.30. How much should I be here? Gary the Worden |
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
lol since u raised with this hand i see no problem checking it here and maybe inducing a bet from someone else. u raised and may be able to get someone to bluff at it. u are almost certain to have the most number of outs here so y lead out when u dont have anything at this point? maybe with a check u make ure hand and someone else get s card they wanted. i guess i understand the bet here but on this flop i think checking wouldve been just as good of an option.
like ronald said what if ure RR preflop? |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why did you post an analysis and then two minutes later give us the result? Allow more time in the future for input
![]() I would bet around 2/3 pot with your draw. If you are reraised, we need to know stack sizes and player notes before thinking any further. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My idea in the pre-flop raise was that I had a decent drawing hand and wanted to build the pot in case I hit. I was happy with the flop and really just want to know how to size a semi-bluff. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Pot Size = 3.30 + 1.50 + 1.50 + 22.70 = $29 Price of Call = $22.70 Pot Odds = 1.28:1 Even if your opponent has a set, you have a 1.4:1 draw to win by the river. And your opponent's range is much larger than just sets. Against top pair, you're a 57% favorite to win by the river. So even if they put you all in, you should still call. If you fold to a raise with this draw, you are burning money, because its such a strong hand. We don't need to know any stack sizes or notes, or any of that other BS. You're out of position with a huge draw, you should be shoving all in if you get the chance at least 95% of the time. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
After the flop, you bet about what I would have. Checking if you think you can get a free card is also legit in my mind.
Preflop, I think a raise with suited connectors is perfectly legit. You don't want to only raise when you have AA. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
TBH, suited or not, the hand you decided to play was total garbage and you got real lucky. Playing these types of hands from UTG/EP are -EV in the long run. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Then, when is ur turn, u re-raise his bet x2. I think ur opponent will not think to your project but a pair highest (QQ / KK / AA) because you raise pre-flop in UTG (hence he believes you are very strong). So he probably will only call or even leave, but you will in any case taken a strong psychological advantage. p.s.: i think occasionally a crazy raise we can do. In fact in this case it's happened a strong hand, which can easily disorient others and make a beautiful pot. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
No shortage of opinions
I very much appreciate the discussion. It's interesting that there's such a range of opinions among such knowledgeable players: anything from "garbage hand" to near monster.
I guess I somewhat disagree with those who think a pre-flop raise is uncalled for. Medium suited connectors are worth a shot. Should I limp into an unraised pot? I almost always choose to make an initial raise. First to maintain an aggressive style and image. Second because I gain more info about the strength of opponents' hands when I raise rather than limp. Third because if I should connect on the flop, I want there to be some money in the pot. Yes, I got lucky with the flop, but I only risked .80 to see it. I might very well have stolen the blinds with that bet - or perhaps have run into a big hand/big raise and been able to fold pre-flop without much damage. How often will you guys play suited connectors or A-suited hands in early position? How often will you raise with them. Your comments have opened my eyes about the strength of the hand post-flop. The flop gave me a drawing hand. I would likely have seen it as only a drawing hand and folded to a significant raise. But I need to remember that a good drawing hand like this can actually be favored over a made hand like trips or big pair. Thanks for the help all, especially c9, James, and norbs. Shinedown, I'd be interested in hearing more about the garbage/negative eV aspect. Gary |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Out-of-position with a monster draw, this is where I'd be check-raising. You want your opponent to put something in the pot, then you apply the pressure. And, if he checks, you get your free card. I'd only lead out here if my opponent was a passive better. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you're a little confused the negative aspect of your play here is opening with 9Ts UTG. After you flop the big draw, I'm willing to get it all-in if possible. Since you're first to act with 4 others in the pot, I think a check, with the plan to raise when someone bets, best accomplishes that goal.
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you are fine in this situation.
In Consideration that you are pot betting. Most cases you will get a good read from this bet, and the possibility that you could take the pot is always good. I would not choose to do this unless you're well updated on your players, and you're getting some tale tell sign of weakness not only in this hand, but possibly for a large period of hands. If you get the lucky pot, sweet. But in most online poker hands I would just check! |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Easy to say
Quote:
Good point, but easy to say, hard to do. And I'm not sure the advice is entirely valid. I posted the question as a semi-bluff situation but have been educated as to the strength of the hand. But let's say I do have a draw that's not quite as strong, or even have pure crap but want to bluff here. Would you really play that the same as AA? I agree with you that disguising your play through consistent opening bets is important, but after a re-raise things change. You are right. Bluff or monster - don't give away info. But if there's a big re-raise, I'm not going to ride a failed bluff to my demise, whereas I would likely come back strong with AA, hoping there is no set or 2Pair. I don't think this contradicts what you're saying though. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not a bad play if you're table image is unpredictable, but at a loose table I'm not sure if I would even play T9o under the gun. With a straight and a flush draw and the action to me, I might bet a third of the pot hoping no one would reraise.
|
| Similar Threads for: Poker > How Much to bet on a semi-bluff? | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I will stake the $200 added with Tom McEvoy | Four Dogs | General Poker | 98 | 19-05-2008 7:06 AM |
| What hand range would it take to get involved here? | Effexor | Strategy Forum | 4 | 12-07-2007 9:17 PM |
