| This is a discussion on bet/folding a scary river instead of check/calling within the online poker forums, in the Cash Games section; i was thinking about value in akward hands today, like where we make a flush or straight on the flop/turn, only to have the board ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| bet/folding a scary river instead of check/calling i was thinking about value in akward hands today, like where we make a flush or straight on the flop/turn, only to have the board pair on the river. my usual gameplan would be check/call here - but are we missing out on value than if we were to value bet/fold instead? |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | bet/folding a scary river instead of check/calling | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| Good question. I think it depends mostly on which card has paired the board, for starters. If it's a board like K-T-9-4-4, it's unlikely someone has a full house and your straight or flush is still probably the best hand. If, instead its Q-J-8-4-J, a board where someone might just have made a full house, I think it depends mostly on how the hand was played through out. Sometimes your check/calling would be the proper way, IMO, even if you might lose value. I don't think that you can play in that spot the same way every time. F Paulsson wrote in the blog section a very interesting article on this subject that I suggest you read. |
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| I agree, the way the hand was played is important. in the K-T-9-4-4 example say i raise X4 BB and get a "cold" caller i cannot put him on a full house here even quads would be hard if i bet on the flop. But if i limp in and he's on the big blind and i try to slow play a flush on the flop he's likely to stay in a hand with 2 pair and catch his full house. Each hand has to be analysed and compared - person, position, your table image etc to determine what you can do here. I'm an optimist and would have confidence in what the right move would be. |
Number of Posts: 3
Number of Authors: 3