7game 6max vs full (8 seat)

#1 7th March 2010, 5:32 PM

Why does everyone seem to want to play 6-max instead of full (8) on FullTilt? (those seem to fill up most often)

Is it because of the PLO and NLH part games in the mix?

#2 9th March 2010, 3:03 AM

FR plo is incredibly boring it's more of a game of who can get the nuts and cooler someone who can't fold the 2nd nuts. Think about it this way, plo has 4 cards and 6 nlhe hands can be made from each plo hand. So 8-handed plo would be the equivalent of 8*6 = 48-handed nlhe. How many people would play 48max nlhe? Even 6max plo is like 36-handed and even 6-handed it's pretty standard to be folding the 2nd nut flush. I find HU plo to be a lot more fun just because there's more room to bluff and stuff rather than just waiting to hit the nuts.

#3 9th March 2010, 3:21 AM

I always get the sense in NLHE that people who play FR tend to be multitabling grinders playing 16 tables at a time and the entire play is so formulaic. It's like grinders playing against other grinders. The typical players per flop is like 19% and its basically blind stealing.

#4 10th March 2010, 1:34 AM

#5 10th March 2010, 2:55 AM

I think there is more action at the 6 max tables.

Full ring is soooooo boring, I fall asleep.

Similar Threads for: Texas Hold'em Poker > 7game 6max vs full (8 seat)
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
I will stake the $200 added with Tom McEvoy	Four Dogs	General Poker	98	19th May 2008 7:06 AM

Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker \| 7game 6max vs full (8 seat)
Full Tilt Poker is one of the top poker sites online. [Note: No US Players Accepted] With Full Tilt referral codes like CC600 you get a $600 bonus.	PokerStars is one of the best places to play poker online that accepts US players. Use PokerStars marketing code CCHAT for a $600 bonus. Note: No US Players Accepted.