| This is a discussion on What SnG Do You Consider The Easiest on FullTilt and PokerStars within the online poker forums, in the Poker Rooms section; Is there a SnG that you consider easiest to consistently be ITM? Although payout is not great, I consider the Single Table Double or Nothing ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| What SnG Do You Consider The Easiest on FullTilt and PokerStars Is there a SnG that you consider easiest to consistently be ITM? Although payout is not great, I consider the Single Table Double or Nothing Turbo on PokerStars to be good. Next, on FullTilt, the Single Table, 9 person Turbo that pays 3 people followed by the 6 person Turbo that pays 2 people. What is your easiest and most consistent for being ITM? How about BoDog? Wally |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | What SnG Do You Consider The Easiest on FullTilt and PokerStars | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| $12 turbo 180 player sit n gos on Stars are super soft, with worse players on average than the $6 single table ones, although obviously variance is huge on those, I would say they are the most profiatble in that entry fee area. $16 18 player ones are also quite profitable. I think in general the single table sit n gos have a lot more multitablers and tougher opposition than multi table sit n gos. |
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| I think it just has a lot to do with how strong someone is at an individual game and if their better at big sit n goes like 45 or 90 people or single table ones. From my experience the same type of sit n goes are about the same level of play or competition on each of the major sites. |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| Personally, on Full Tilt I like playing the $3.30 KO Sit N Go Turbo, the knockout bounties are .50c so if you make it close to the bubble you usually have your buy-in paid fore in knockout's. I also like playing the DBL or Nothing tables |
|
#5 | ||||
| ||||
| re: What SnG Do You Consider The Easiest on FullTilt and PokerStars anything low buy in, with little regulars.. if your game is good, will be high ROI and ITM % the higher you go, the more regs, the less ROI, in some high stakes cases, even the best players are just breakeven, "spacegravy" and guys like that. but obv they make a lot with rake and whatever.. |
|
#7 | ||||
| ||||
| I like the 45 person SnG's. Variance of course but seems like Ive been able to grind a bankroll better than the 9 persons. Not sure why but I just do not enjoy playing the double or nothing's. Doesnt seem like alot of poker being played. Just tight, wait for cards or for others to get busted. |
|
#9 | ||||
| ||||
| I think the easiest is the $1.20 matrix on Full Tilt Poker, although it may not be the best value. |
|
#10 | ||||
| ||||
| re: What SnG Do You Consider The Easiest on FullTilt and PokerStars I like the .30c sit and go to the daily dollar on full tilt are easy. They go quick and my ROI is always good because people don't take it seriously. On the other hand, the max you can win is $1 |
|
#11 | ||||
| ||||
| Full Tilt Q to the DD like above and the DD is usually good but I dont like staying up too late and it is a big field but pays over 1000 places. I also like the small ring games now because I am learning cash game strategy and if you are good you can make a couple $. |
|
#15 | ||||
| ||||
| re: What SnG Do You Consider The Easiest on FullTilt and PokerStars Quote:
|
| Similar Threads for: What SnG Do You Consider The Easiest on FullTilt and PokerStars > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| Where to play now for U.S. players? | 138 | 1st July 2011 11:35 AM | Poker Rooms | sarahholt3 |
Number of Posts: 15
Number of Authors: 15