Which Poker Site Has the Worst Players?

I recently moved to Full Tilt and found the standard of players found there to be quite high compared to other sites I'd played on, namely Party Poker & Planet Poker, where I'd always consitently won money.

So in the interests of making as mush cash as possible, which site(s) do you all think have the worst players & are therefore easiest to win money at?

worst players - definitley Tribeca ( Victor Chandler , Golden Palace etc. )

BUT - i wouldnt say that its easier to win money there than elsewhere since u will have big suckouts very often since the players there call with anything and are very aggressive . You see guys burning 50 $ in 10 minutes at 1/2 $ limit . You as an experienced poker player know they play bad ( worse than that ) but that doesnt save you from getting sucked out by them 5 times in a row when limping in with AA or any other premium hand you waited for .

I made good money there once, but you really gotta deal with Biiiiig swings and must be a player that doesnt go on tilt fast .

Last reload i did at Golden palace i got eaten by those swings .
My player notes looked all like this : " bluffer , aggressive ,reraise preflop with A3 offsuit , gut shot chaser , backdoor flush chaser , bets with no hand - checks with a hand etc. etc. "



Personally i prefer party poker since the players there are a little more stable than on tribeca .

Well , try it and tell us how you r doing . You will see showdowns where you dont believe your eyes .

HF , Poo_Poo

partypoker has the biggest online poker room, so they've statistically got the most fish.

Well, from my experience, which is limited, it has to be Pacific. I have made a nice profit there playing some really bad players. I have been sucked out a ton there though, mostly in limit. The sit-n-go's there have been very,very profitable. I must tell you this. I am going to pull most of my money out of here soon because of there support issues. I have had NONE at this moment, but it will prob. happen sooner or later with all the bad stories I've heard. Be warned that you might have support issues if you do play there, but the players are bad.

Players at pacific are pretty bad ( had a 100$ all in with Rockets called pre flop by J-6 suited) They get a lot of players crossing over from the casino (888) whose poker skills are questionable. On the down side, the software is terrible, is subject to freeze ups and often disconnects you when you have a massive hand. doh!

I agree with you that the competition at Pacific is awful, along with the software. The 888 Casino is heavily advertised in non-internet media so you end up with every Tom, Dick and Harry there.

oh man this ones easy

1 partypoker
2 pokerstars
3 pacific
4 the prima network
5 pokerhost - very easy clean

Actually look for sites with big sign up bonuses, this attracts the new players . For soft competition you can try Party poker , Pokerstars low level games , from 1.50 to 20 dollar sit n goes, and up to 5 dollars limits .

i would put ULTIMATEBET top when it came to the looses player they throw their chips in with nothing

Ya if you like playing with very loose players that will call all in with anything play at Party Poker. But i have also run across these types of players at Poker Host, and the ring tables at Titan(Have not played any big mtt's at Titan yet).

1.)PartyPoker
2.)Pacific
3.)BetonUsa

If you want some real competition you have to play at Party Poker, no doubt, the best players play there. Matter of fact two of this past years WSOP final table guys were Party Poker players. Only play at Party tho if your game is tight, cause you could run into me and I have a 57% poker prohecy percentage in 10 person sit n go's. with about 340 under my belt. I don't like to brag tho, I didn't get my handle for nothing. Oh and with this being my first post here, Id like to say whats up to everybody.

Now for a little tid bit of knowledge:

Ulimate bet is mostly your proto-typical "good" but not "pro" competition. They can be destroyed on all limits by great players, morso than loose a$$'s which you find on all sites. Basically they will lay down quality hands to you if you represent them correctly.

Pacific Poker has some horrible players that will bend over and let you take all there chips from them. All you need to bust them is two random cards and patience as they are a weak a$$ bunch of weak-sauce limpers, who have little sence of the game. Very little.

Full Tilt, and Poker Stars, have the second and third strongest competition, behind Party Poker.

Oh yeah dont play on Pacific Poker they have screwed me over with dissconections up the ying yang.

I don't think I have given a definative answer on the weak poker sites, but Party Poker is definately not one of them. You need a minimum of 2 years experience before you tread those waters.

Isn't Party considered the fishbowl in terms of online poker?

Party Poker is the toughest competition on the net, man, they have people on that site that eat, drink and excrete poker. Party Poker should be everyone's last option, unless of course, you wanna get out-played. You know what, maybe everyone should play on Party Poker. I mean how else are you going to improve your game? Do you think Michael Jordan improved his game by playing in the 6ft and under league? Do you thin Johnny Chan improved his game by playing on Ulimate Bet? NOOOO! He played against Doyle friggin Brunson! HE PLAYED ON PARTY POKER! Or at least the equivalent to it. So go ahead, and make a deposit at Party Poker. Go ahead and get waxed, then get back on your feet, then get waxed again, then get crippled, then go bust. Hopefully through all of the turmoil of missed reads, getting out-played, confusion, missed attempted out-draws, and lonely rivers, you will obtain the skill that is required to become a great player. FEAR MIKE SEXTON!

It's any site on the Boss network like King Solomon or Pokerheaven. Mostly central European folks without a clue how to play...

Poker Stars is full of crappy players.

I'd have to give my vote to Poker Stars. Here's why: I've gotten a 4 of a kiind, Aces there during an FR. I had the nut hand, as there were no chances of getting anything better. When I had trips, I bet $750, and I was called, so I re-raised it to $1250, and again he called. When quads came up on the river, I went all-in for $5150. Again he called, and showed a pair of 7s! I was thinking, "thanks for the free chips buddy!" Why why why would you call a re-raise when the board shows trip Aces????

id say, pacific is worst, and party poker 2nd worst

Any site that I play at LOL. Im horrible

Isn't the idea to play better players?
If you want to grind it out but have easy money 99.9% of the time, try Titan $2 H2h tables. Won 5 in a row in less than 20 min. during lunch today. If you see me there, stay away because I kill those tables.

what about pitbull ? they have freerolls on the hour every hour ! just u wait till hand before last flop card and go all in and watch them fold!

Gotta agree - Pacfic is the worst site for bad beats I've ever seen.

Nice Avatar LIST!!!!

H'away the lads

MackemMan

Old topic, first post, sorry for both.

I feel that after playing on PokerStars, Doyle's Room, Full Tilt Poker, and Party Poker all 4 for significant amounts of time, I'm confident that in my experiences, FTP had the worst players by far. I feel the reason being is because along with PokerStars, Full Tilt has the most advertising and also had intriguing bonus offers and top notch professional endorsers.

How's this for a twist though? Saying that playing bad players will make you more money, while the opposite can be true some of the time as well. Bad players can draw out and hit miracle cards. Good players are easier to read and put on hands. If you know a player is good, his array of potential hands are much less than a loose player.

I am talking omaha and the easiest money i ever made was on fairpoker. Been offline for awhile so cant say now, but on a $25 depo to play in a forum challenge league i cashed out $200 twice and i think i still have some coins and a buck or 2.Want donks for holdem, try poker770. Be warned frustration to all who enter. Peace

Easiest money in Omaha was PokerHeaven (BOSS network?)... when there's a table going (which was too rare for my liking), making easy money playing made hands for as many raises as I could get. Doesn't seem to happen so much now... Party has long been good to me, with really bad players compared to the likes of Stars.
Did notice things tightening up on most of the sites after the US players ban, though. Harder to find an Omaha games on some sites, too

carbon poker is bad for that. hardcore sucky romanians.

Probably party poker, just becasue the level of play for the most part is inexperienced. But you have to learn sometime. I agree with what your saying about fulltilt, that the level of play is high and more challenging. that's probably the main reason i play there now becasue that's the only way to make me a better player.

I 2nd that, I love to play at pacific

Oh, absolutely.

LMAO. I was gonna say that!

If only they let Americans play there.

If only played Everest for few day but it is with out of doubt the softest place if ever played on.
Every one thing K3 is the nuts and J5 is gold

In my experience Full Tilt has the biggest donks. At first i thought maybe it was just the lower limit tourny's but as i moved up in scale i found it to be almost exactly the same playing a $15 tournament(i was knocked out of one with AA against 72 suited when he two paired the river. to which the player exclaimed "**** aces". I was the bubble in a 1200 player tourny) as it was playing in the $1 tournys.

Granted I have only played at Bodog(My fav so far), Full Tilt, Cake Poker, and Poker Stars.

I think the biggest donks are at Bodog sense you got the other forms of gambling and maybe somebody won big and don't care to lose a few bucks