| This is a discussion on One Quarter of FTP's seized accounts unfrozen within the online poker forums, in the Poker Rooms section; http://www.egrmagazine.com/news/1667...daily-snapshot Good News!... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| One Quarter of FTP's seized accounts unfrozen |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | One Quarter of FTP's seized accounts unfrozen | |
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| Thanks for the link It doesn't make a lot of sense to me why FTP still hasn't paid off the US players. Poker Stars was hit with the same DOJ actions and I've already gotten my PS bankroll back. |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| re: One Quarter of FTP's seized accounts unfrozen poker Quote:
Full Tilt acted nearly as poorly as UB, yet for some reason people keep defending them. I'm not sure I understand why that is but I"m sure glad I chose to play on Stars. GL |
|
#5 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| I got a tweet from Tony G. (I'm just a follower by the way.) Huge news on the FTP bank account in Ireland today. I rate 99.5% for USA players to be paid out. Some news must be coming very soon. This tweet came out about the same time this thread was written. that's all I could find for now. Maybe I'll get my $300 back. I could use it. Later. Last edited by pcgnome : 27th May 2011 at 11:47 PM. |
|
#8 | ||||
| ||||
| re: One Quarter of FTP's seized accounts unfrozen poker Pretty much just explains what we already knew about FTP's problems. If the DOJ didn't seize the funds and payment processors, most of this crap wouldn't have occurred. The players who had fully funded accounts and didn't play with money FTP didn't get, should be paid back NOW!!! |
|
#9 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#10 | ||||
| ||||
| It's my understanding that FT and PS treated player deposits differently. PS is required as part of it's Isle of Man business permit to keep player funds in a segregated account separate from operating funds. FT wasn't required to do so, so they didn't. Instead they very likely invested it in things like bonds to generate revenue from money that essentially is just lying around otherwise. Believe me when I say that is PS weren't required to do otherwise by law, they would have done the exact same thing as FT. People will get their money back from FT, it's probs just locked up somewhere at the moment, there are penalties for early withdrawals from most investments. That added to the fact that FT probably doesn't have several hundred million lying around means they'll have to wait a bit longer. PS fluked this one and they're now making up for all the money they've lost from keeping the money separate by earning good will and good publicity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_run "Several techniques can help to prevent bank runs. They include temporary suspension of withdrawals" |
Number of Posts: 12
Number of Authors: 12