| This is a discussion on NO MORE SHORT STACKS ON FTP? within the online poker forums, in the Poker Rooms section; Has anybody else heard that the FTP update in January is going to raise the minimum buy-in? I heard this on another big poker forum ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| NO MORE SHORT STACKS ON FTP? Has anybody else heard that the FTP update in January is going to raise the minimum buy-in? I heard this on another big poker forum, but I don't want to link to it here, because that wouldn't be right. It is speculated to be a 40bb minimum buy-in now instead of 20bb. Think about how much this is going to change the game! Anyways there were some other changes listed too, but I mostly play cash so that was what caught my eye. Feel free to speculate with me in the thread and talk about how this is going to change your game. |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | NO MORE SHORT STACKS ON FTP? | |
|
|
|
#7 | ||||
| ||||
| re: NO MORE SHORT STACKS ON FTP? poker Buying in for 20 BB is kinda pathetic. I've never understood why such people don't just play at lower levels where their stacks could have some weight. That said, it's quite the sport to beat up on small stacks. One assumes they are playing scared...and it's pleasant to play with people who are anxious. |
|
#11 | ||||
| ||||
| Having been shortstacking for about a month on fulltilt after buying in deep all the time this sux. I enjoy playing the 20bb showdownstyle shove or fold. It's so easy to multitable and rack up the ftps and rakeback I even went to the nl $5 10 and bought in for 200 to play with the bigboys. I see about 3 shortstackers per 9handed table so I don't know why they want to kill 33% of their cashgame customers. There are already are 50bb min deep tables for the players scared or annoyed of the shortstacking ratholers. |
|
#14 | ||||
| ||||
| re: NO MORE SHORT STACKS ON FTP? poker Quote:
I guess most people are here on C.C to improve their game, learn and play "interesting" poker not shove or fold stuff. Obviously the majority have spoken and you and your ratholers are goin to have to find another playground. sorry mate, but you had a lil fun and profit while it lasted |
|
#15 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
It just depends on the shortstacker. The ones that will book as soon as they double/triple up, like JEP712 drive everyone up the wall and is the reason why people hate SS'ers. But I have seen people sit down at the table with minimum and then build it up to 200BB before they leave. I have no problem with them. And doops, what if they are SS'ing at 2NL? There is no lower that they can go... just a thought |
|
#19 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Anyway I really doubt this'll change much in the game at all. They'll still play tight, if not tighter now that they have to put up double the buy-in, and hit n' run like never before IMO. Thanks Ferguson.... |
|
#20 | ||||
| ||||
| 35-40bb, i dont care, anything like that is a huge improvement. to the guy that said they will lose customers, i doubt that, they will gain me as an active reg if these changes are implemented, surely many others too who dont want to play with shitstackers at ANY of their tables. God that feels so niceto say, NO SHORTSTACKS EVER AGAIN ON FTP?!?! YESSSSSSSSSSSS! |
|
#22 | ||||
| ||||
| What are "deep stack" tables then? I thought those tables were for people that didn't wanna play shortstacks? I love shortstacks.. They seem to make me the most profit with the very very predictable nature and at little risk too. Confused... |
|
#24 | ||||
| ||||
| Maybe they should create $10NL tables where you can only buy in for $2 since that seems to be 1/3 of the players at any $10NL table on FT. They won't lose any customers, the SS people will just buy in for $4 or $3.50 and still play the same way. |
|
#25 | ||||
| ||||
| there's pros and cons to everthing. and you most remember change is the only thing that's constant, so you either go with the flow or......you gripe about it. it won't effect me much right now since i play mostly tournies very few ring games, unless they're offering some type of bonus. like now FT has 3xFTP's. good luck all. peace. |
|
#26 | ||||
| ||||
| Big Blinds! First off, I'm a MTT player but even I would not want to bring the the minimum BB to the table...if I'm reading you correctly..in a $1.00/.50 game you have to bring a min. of $20 just to sit down right? As it is now! How long can that last? I think I'ld feel more comfortable with $40 even if it doesn't become the new minimum! Then again I love TOUNAMENT play! |
|
#27 | ||||
| ||||
| I used to shortstack alot, before I realized it is kinda dumb, and boring. Now I can't seem to find alot of tables without more than half the table with 20BB or less, it sucks. So I will be happy if this happens, and it will guarantee I won't go back to my old ways... |
|
#28 | ||||
| ||||
| re: NO MORE SHORT STACKS ON FTP? poker Tonight's the night. CHANGES COMING TOMORROW. http://twitter.com/FTPDoug |
|
#31 | ||||
| ||||
| im really happy for your ftpdoug and imma let you finish.... BUT STARS HAS THE BEST SERVICE OF ALL TIME, OF ALL TIME! but seriously im very happy, omgomgomgomgomg, ****ingt die all shortstacks, dieeeeeeeeeeee OH GLORYIOUSSSSS DAYSSSS |
|
#32 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
if they must change then they should at least leave 2 nl the way it is so people can play away their last 23 cents |
|
#33 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Another benefit of short stacked play is that you're more likely to get called by weaker hands like AJ, AT, KQ or small pairs that would ordinarily fold to such a large preflop bet. In short, you have no leverage. What this means is that since you have no money behind you, you pose no danger beyond your initial preflop bet. I've also heard some people say that it's a cheap way to see a higher level, but mostly, the short stackers are just bad players who are afraid of getting outplayed post flop. |
|
#34 | ||||
| ||||
| Crap, it's finally here tomorrow you say. Threatening before it would happen in early Jan I was hoping ftp would reconsider as they already have designed deep stack tables and there are always 3 out of 9 at least shortstacking each table. They are hurting 33pct of their customer base so sad. I guess shoving 40bb will become the norm by the spring. Get used to that lol. Last hurrah for me to hit the 24 nl 36nl 510nl tables. Already hit every 24nl table during this happy hour, came about 125 bux ahead buying in 80 at a time. Time to hit the bigger limits. |
|
#35 | ||||
| ||||
| re: NO MORE SHORT STACKS ON FTP? poker Wish I didnt see this thread today, that's not true, wish I just won my flips when I rehit the tables. Was up 125now down 300 thx to nl36 bad runs. I do better in tourneys. Doing well in potlimitomahahighlow tourney of all things, private $10 buyin with 500 added juice. |
| Similar Threads for: NO MORE SHORT STACKS ON FTP? > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| playing optimally against short stacks (question) | 6 | 15th March 2012 1:55 AM | Cash Games | Campbell92 |
| DOJ adds Lederer/Ferguson/Furst to Complaint - Claims defrauded poker players | 194 | 2nd November 2011 11:53 PM | General Poker | alaskabill |
| FTP license has been revoked | 20 | 2nd October 2011 11:50 PM | Poker Rooms | coolnout |
| What's the best way to play against short stacks? | 5 | 25th February 2011 11:36 PM | Cash Games | ramdeebam |
| playing against short stacks | 11 | 22nd December 2010 3:43 AM | Tournament Poker | thunder1276 |
Number of Posts: 55
Number of Authors: 34