Do u feel your luck changes one site to next???

Hi all.

I think I`m letting off steam here, so here goes...

I always get great results @ Party Poker

I started great @ Full Tilt now it is living up to its name - and I`m on it!!!

I can`t win an argument @ Pokerstars - but I know why, I played lots of ring games to boost my points - big mistake!!!

So, all I can think is my bankroll I have built up at Party is around $1,500 & at the other 2 sites it is always around $100.

Any thoughts or any similar experiences???

BTW, obviously FT & Stars are rigged but Party is a fair site

Yup Im joining Party Poker

In all seriousness though people call it riverstars but I find im rivered just as much at full tilt. I too am finding fulltilt a slog having started a small freeroll win I cannot get over 35 dollars.

I would say play on one site for the week, some times its a case of getting use to the software, blind levels etc. Also what games are you playing?

In the main PL OMaha hi lo.

Don`t get me wrong, I`m $400 + up so far in September, but the frustration

Ive always had great luck on full tilt and after trying (and losing) on pokerstars, Im going to keep with the safe option and keep on at full tilt! - mind u i only ever get bad luck - when i win its obviously just skill and there's no luck involved *cough*

It is self fulfilling.

You are doing bad on one site so you switch. Your additude is better and more expectant. Your mind is geared to expect success and is therefore feresher and more able to make better decisions than when you were depresed at losing on the previous site.

Some times a change just for the sake of change is a good thing.

I dont really believe in rigged online poker. i think that if they were going to rig their site, someone would be all over it. as for your problems at pokerstars and tilt, every site has players that are different. some sites have a lot more bad players than others. and i think that pokerstars and tilt are at the top of the list for them. so i say stick with party poker and keep winnin =)

My 'streaks' seem to run the same - live and online. The particular 'site' has no bearing and Lady Luck is not exclusively sponsored by any one site. She's not employed by any one specific casino either ...

My biggest of 4 BR's is on FT, but that's partly because it's where I've played the most stud cash games with FR winnings.

'Party' is the rigged site - rigged against U.S. players ... . .

Without complaining, I too seek the site that on any given day seems more friendly than the others. I can no longer count the number of times where it seems the only place I win on a given day is Ultimatebet. And it is often the last place I play on that mythical 'any given day'.

Just to say guys, this is not a "pokers is rigged" article - far from it.

It is a mindset thing as DREW said "A change is as good as a rest"

jburm911 - are you saying there are better players on pokerstars & FT ???

I would say that if there was a site where the players are poor it would not stay that way for long. All of the pro players would join - easy cash ?

The post was only a fun post. The reason I think I have found FT/ Stars harder than Party is simple - its a bankroll thing.

I play MTT & SNG`s in the main. I play normally around $10 + buy in`s. This does not work when I only start with say $100 on pokerstars & FT, but on Party I`m sitting with a BR of $1,500.

It is dificult to play say $1 buy ins, win a SNG and get about $5 back!!!

Nah I understand where your coming from, its good to let of a little steam, I really do think that some sites for me just take a little longer to get used too.

i was having a really bad time playing on Ladbrokes, getting a number of ridiculous bad beats. i have since moved to VC and the bad beats have got worse by 2 fold, it seems they don't like you to play premium hands!