| This is a discussion on Chosing your seat within the online poker forums, in the Poker Rooms section; When joining a table is it better to sit to the left or right of a big stack? Surely to the left. This gives you ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Chosing your seat When joining a table is it better to sit to the left or right of a big stack? Surely to the left. This gives you position on them and you can avoid their big bluffs without committing any money to the pot. The reason why I ask is that Ive been watching a table for about an hour with two biggish stacks and people always join to the right of them. The bigger stacks obliterates them in short order. I have been watching them for a while and ones a solid but very aggressive player (IMO that is) and normally places well in tourneys etc. The person to his left is nowhere near as good but is still maintaining his stack. |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Chosing your seat | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| I agree, to the left. They are more prone to try to bully if they have a huge stack. I f you don't have cards that you want to play, you can toss 'em. I personnally like to sit down at a table that is just forming with the max limit buy-in. |
|
#4 | ||||
| ||||
| On the one hand, if the big stack is to your right, you can be protected from a lot of marginal hands. The big stack makes many of your iffy decisions for you, when he is aggressive, you want to be extremely strong to even get into the pot. On the other hand, if the big stack is too your left, you will have to be almost ultra aggressive to get him to respect you. This puts you in serious jeopardy. You can't steal as often, and bluffing becomes less profitable. |
| Similar Threads for: Chosing your seat > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| Comment on my last 10 hands? | 2 | 11th February 2012 1:40 PM | Tournament Poker | doomasiggy |
| Where am I going wrong | 3 | 20th September 2011 7:55 PM | Learning Poker | cypoker |
Number of Posts: 6
Number of Authors: 5