| This is a discussion on Battle of the planets Pokerstars within the online poker forums, in the Poker Rooms section; Battle of the planets: Every week I try this in Mars or Venus. I never do bad but I have yet to make it in ... |
| | ||||||
![]() |
| |
|
#1 | ||||
| ||||
| Battle of the planets Pokerstars Battle of the planets: Every week I try this in Mars or Venus. I never do bad but I have yet to make it in the top ten. I also only try for the low orbit because 100 is too many for me. Anyone every play in this? |
| Play Texas Hold'em Online Poker | Battle of the planets Pokerstars | |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
| ||||
| I've played it from time to time. Took down a low orbit once and placed in top 100 spots a few times. Here is a small guide I wrote on it. |
|
#3 | ||||
| ||||
| Thanks for linking to that post, I might start going for this in the 5 dollar range. Question though, do the dollar values matter for points? Can i play the $5 SnGs with the idea I won't be beaten by people playing the higher stakes within that range? |
|
#6 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#8 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Battle of the planets Pokerstars I came 15th in the High orbit Venus ($5-$10) section last week which got me $40, playing only 9 player turbos. I ran amazingly good at the start of a block and was in with a strong chance of 1st after about 80 sit n gos, and over 1400 score already, then I just ran like utter crap and barely cashed anything in the last 20, and my score only went up to 1550 at the end I don't really see why playing the 27 tournaments gives you any better chance of winning. I think you need to run like God and be very lucky, not just play well, to get in the top 5 at this in either high or low orbit. |
|
#10 | ||||
| ||||
| Not sure if I can agree with that... Quote:
Not sure if I can agree with that because the top five places in the 27 mans share a total of 216 BotP points between them, while in the 9 mans the top 3 share 90 and the 6 mans 60 points. The 27 mans should be sharing 270 points to be in the same proportion as the 6 and 9 mans, therefore they are poorer value. There would have to be a far greater ratio of bad players in the 27 mans for a decent player to overcome this mathematical disadvantage! |
|
#11 | ||||
| ||||
| 18 man games provide a decent chance to get on the leaderboards and I have got on it a few times playing these games with the levels we play you are always going to need a little bit of run good to hit the top positions though. My advice is to not get to bothered about the BOP, when I first started playing the games and this came out I was always checking my points etc. Dont bother just play your best game everytime you play and keep improving and you willl get on there a few times. |
|
#12 | ||||
| ||||
| re: Battle of the planets Pokerstars I only play 27 SNGs. I Hit the final table 90% of the time and seem to cash maybe 1/3 of the time. The reason I play the 27 SNGs is because they pay more leaderboard points. I don't think I would be very good at 1 table SNGs. I make the final table almost every 27 player SNG so whats the point in 18 player SNGs. |
|
#13 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
To be honest though I think you should stop thinking about the bonuses and just play you best game, hopefully as a side effect you will hit the BOP, but probally not most times. |
| Similar Threads for: Battle of the planets Pokerstars > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
| Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | Thread Starter |
| Joe Hachem no longer a PokerStars Team Pro | 4 | 23rd December 2011 8:44 PM | General Poker | OzExorcist |
| PokerStars bans me for no reason..mods adds "for suspected multi-accounting" | 29 | 9th November 2011 6:26 PM | Poker Deposit & Withdrawal Methods | MeowImQh |
| * April Asperger Apricot Auto-Erotic Asphyxiation Serious Poker Content Chat Thread* | 1925 | 1st May 2011 6:15 PM | Cash Games | Marginal |
Number of Posts: 13
Number of Authors: 7