The NETeller Effect is Overrated
From an extremely un-scientific and not-at-all random sampling, I’m happy to announce that Stars has now rebounded from the NETeller effect and is mostly back to where they were before.
I’m not actually dumb enough to believe my own statistical survey, but I’m at least happy that today, I had ample tables to choose from. On a slightly related note, I’ve had the sickest rush of cards to date this week. ~160BB won over 1,348 hands. While randomly violating proper statistical rules, perhaps I ought to offer this (12BB/100) as the new industry standard for win-rates to Gary Carson?
I’m working on a new series of articles dealing with flop decisions in limit hold ‘em. It’ll be awhile before it’s ready to be put up on the site, and in the mean time it means most of my CardsChat time is spent on not-blogging, so bear with me.
1) To tell you the truth, I didn’t even notice any change with Neteller pulling out. I guess it had less of an effect on the lower stakes…
2) Nice to see you’re on a nice upswing after that 100BB downswing I heard about
3) *ChuckTs waits in excitement for the new articles…
Comment by ChuckTs — January 27, 2007 @ 10:41 am
I didn’t notice any real dips at FullTilt except for their big 750k tournament the weekend before last. The 300k guaranteed yesterday was pretty packed. Otherwise seems like there are plenty of games to choose from.
Comment by PokerLetter.org — January 30, 2007 @ 2:02 am